AI pricing models look the same in a vendor demo and feel very different at the end of the first billing cycle. This comparison lets you model per-seat, usage-based, and hybrid pricing against your actual usage pattern — so you pick the model that matches your reality, not the demo.

What's inside

Three-model comparison with your specific user count, expected active-user percentage, and typical cost ranges. Outputs annual cost, wasted spend on inactive seats, and the breakeven points where each model becomes optimal.

How to use it

  1. Score against your specific use case, not against generic benchmarks. The 'best' tool is the one that fits your situation.
  2. Weight the criteria before you score. Otherwise you'll over-index on whichever column has more bullet points.
  3. Re-run the comparison every 6–12 months. The vendor landscape moves faster than most procurement cycles.